Minnesota Network for Progressive Action


 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

We're Debating Contraception Again? Really?

Category: Society
Posted: 02/09/12 16:25

by Dave Mindeman

I have a hard time believing that we are going to have to rehash the old birth control arguments. But here we are.

When Obama issued the mandate that employer backed insurance must include birth control tablet coverage the reaction has indeed been curious.

The pushback from Catholic Bishops is the most curious. Since they are all men, as mandated by the church, the idea that they would control the issue is almost funny. And when you take into accout this recent poll....even more so:

A majority (55%) of Americans agree that ?employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception and birth control at no cost.

But there is a more important element....

Roughly 6-in-10 Catholics (58%) believe that employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception.

Are the Bishops speaking for the laity? Obviously not, but then Catholic laypeople have always diverged from their religious leadership. It is one of the ironic nuances of this paternalistic religion.

Still the rise of Rick Santorum raises another issue about birth control. Or as he puts it....the promiscuity threat.

But before we look at Santorum's argument, let's get the correlation between unwanted pregnancy and birth control pills or devices. This study states the facts:

The study found that in 2008, just 67.8 per every 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 19 got pregnant. That?s down from 1990′s high point, when 116.9 out of every 1,000 became pregnant. ?Continuing decreases in teen pregnancy more recently may be driven by increased use of the most effective contraceptive methods as well as dual method use,? the Guttmacher Institute explained. ?In sum, teens appear to be making the decision to be more effective contraceptive users, and their actions are paying off in lower pregnancy, birth and abortion rates.?

Let's also make the larger correlation. Less unwanted pregnancies, less abortions. Isn't that the larger goal?

But let's return to Rick Santorum. Here's his opinion:

?One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country.......Many of the Christian faith have said, well, that?s okay, contraception is okay. It?s not okay. It?s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.?

Santorum believes that the punishment for teens having sex is the pregnancy itself. You can't allow teens to have birth control...they need to face their potential punishment.

It always confuses me that the most ardent anti-choice people are also against the most effective method of preventing abortions...birth control.

Pregnancies should be planned, safe, wanted and welcomed.

Not a punishment from the moral order.
comments (6) permalink
02/11/12 23:19
"Religious liberty" is a straw man. Those folks can practice whatever they choose.. If they are in business,(with federal monies, I might add) they must follow the rules/ regs like every other business.

 
02/09/12 23:25
I had Charlie Rose on the TV yesterday as I was nurturing my cup of coffee. He was interviewing a spokesman for the Catholic Church, and a Washington Post reporter about the recent proclamation from the Obama Administration. Remember what the world said after 9/11? "Today, we are all Americans." After seeing what this administration is capable of doing to our US Constitution, I think today, we are ALL Catholic. If you think this debate is about abortion, and who pays for it, you are missing the point.


Washington Post's Michael Gerson said on Charlie Rose:

He continued, "(This) represents in a lot of ways an important political philosophic debate -- not a debate about contraception. It's how you view liberalism. Classical liberalism was the protection of individuals and groups and their rights not to reflect the majority views. Modern liberalism in this sense seems to be the imposition of liberal values on institutions that are regarded as backwards. I think that's the opposite of pluralism and it's provoked an understandable and natural reaction among not just Catholics, but I think Protestants and others who care about religious liberty."

 
02/09/12 23:24
BTW, I am a Democrat , and I am completely ashamed of the male members of my party walking into that religious nonsense trap.
 
02/09/12 19:59
I been watching the tripe being peddled on the tube the past few days, and I am livid. In particular, I am incensed over the so-called liberals/ Dems speaking as some kind of authorities on how religious freedom is being compromised by religiously connected business employer -backed insurance ...and surprise, surprise,they are all male Catholics. They make me gag .
I am 78 years old , and I am sick to death of men still calling the shots on women's reproductive rights.
Mr. Wilfahrt is exactly right .And we certainly need more men like him in office. Go, Jeff !
 
02/09/12 19:04

FYI : On the MNPolticialRoundtable, John Kline is quoted objecting to Plan B contraceptives (and the quote is unclear if he also objecting to condoms) being sold at his alma mater's health services facility ... even though it is not open after 2PM on Friday or the weekend.

 
02/09/12 17:29
I've long since forgotten the source, it was in the Carter years I believe. To the subject of the male church hierarchy on birth control,

"You no playa' da game, you no maka' da rules."

True then, true now.
 
Post comment
Name
E-mail
Homepage
Comment
Options


« First « Previous

Calendar

« September 2014 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Latest posts


Comments


Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.