Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

The I-35 Bridge Reopens Thursday, Then It's Back to "Normal"

Category: I-35 Bridge
Posted: 09/17/08 02:13, Edited: 09/17/08 02:15

by Dave Mindeman

It shouldn?t take a tragedy to build a bridge this fast in America. -- Sec. of Transportation, Mary Peters. I-35 Bridge Ceremonies on 9/15/2008

Yes, the I-35 Bridge will reopen on Thursday. Well ahead of schedule. FlatIron will get a substantial bonus and all the politicians are praising the speed and functionality of this new structure.

But we can't forget that a tragedy took place here a little over a year ago. This bridge would not be here right now if people had not died on August 1, 2007.

I'm with Tribune columnist Nick Coleman on this.

A simple press release, on state stationery, would have sufficed: "New Bridge to Open Thursday." Instead, we got a shameful media hog pile, with six members of Congress, two U.S. senators, the mayor of Minneapolis, scads of legislators, aldermen and other hangers-on, praising themselves for their teamwork, their leadership, their partnership, blah, blah, blah. They did their jobs. They gave themselves high marks.

There is something unseemly about politicians being involved in a ceremony to "celebrate" the opening of this new bridge. It wasn't built because they desired it or thought it was needed.... to put it simply....it was built because something tragic happened.

As Norm Coleman pats himself on the back.... showing us how he can work with everyone to "get things done". As Tim Pawlenty gives his approval of a structure that would never have happened in his administration under normal circumstances. And all the rest of them, who, to lesser or greater degrees, took credit for putting this bridge in place.... in spite of the stonewalling on transportation that was all too prevalent prior to August 1, 2007......

To all of you...please, do not praise your role in a public work that began in tragedy. Rather, reflect on your responsibility to the citizens you represent. Reflect on their expectation that they can go about their daily life with the assurance that you will provide them a national infrastructure of roads and bridges that are safe, functional, and efficient.

When tragedy struck here a little over a year ago, money was not an issue.....a question of need was not asked..... and a speedy completion of the project was simply assumed.

My guess is that after the bridge reopens on Thursday, we will soon get back to the partisan bickering over road costs, the taxes that pay for them, and whose priority is more important.

In other words, we will be back to the real version of normal in Minnesota.
comments (0) permalink

Please Visit Coleman for Senate!

Category: Norm Coleman
Posted: 09/16/08 15:35

by Dave Mindeman

Please, I encourage you to visit a Republican website today. Please, please, visit Norm Coleman...


Please notice that when you go to that site, you do not see any reference to Norm Coleman....you do not see any discussion of any issues.... you do not see talk about the future of Minnesota...


All you see is a dark, negative... Halloween like, page that talks about Al Franken in the worst possible way.

Now, if there was any doubt about who is the candidate of negativitiy in the Minnesota race for Senate, then I assure you, one look at that site will convince you.

Nice job, Senator Coleman.....I am sure that is a convincing way to show your ability to "work with others to get things done".
comments (4) permalink

Anatomy of a Minnesota Republican "Message Test"

Category: Minnesota Politics
Posted: 09/15/08 11:56

by Dave Mindeman

I had a call from Provo, Utah last night and I am going to tell you about that call and some subsequent conversations I had regarding it.

We have a contested House race in this Minnesota Legislative House district -- 37A, Apple Valley and Burnsville. Democrat Shelley Madore currently holds that seat, but she won in 2006 by a very narrow margin (about 400 votes). Thus it would be assumed she is targeted by the GOP House caucus. Her opponent is a young (20 something), GOP House staffer running for the first time, named Tara Mack.

This call was about that race. The first question was: "Could I speak to the oldest female voter in the household?" That would be my wife -- she got on the phone and I listened in.

First there were some demographic questions and some short opinions on President and Senate candidates...but that was obviously not the focus of the call because the rest of it was all about House District 37A.

This call came from Western Watts in Provo, Utah. They provide the manpower to make these calls, but the script is furnished by The Tarrance Group out of Arlington, Virginia. The Tarrance Group has roughly 80 political clients -- all of them Republican and one of them is the Republican Party of Minnesota.

The questions began this way:

"We would like you to tell us if the following statements about a candidate would make you more likely or less likely to vote for that candidate."

A couple of statements followed about Tara Mack:

1) Tara Mack works for the legislature and will be ready to serve the district on day one.

2) Tara Mack is a fiscal conservative and will work hard to lower taxes and decrease spending.

Then they abruptly shifted to larger series of statements about Shelley Madore:

(1) Shelley Madore voted to give Minneapolis schools $4500 per pupil in additional funding. That's 53% higher funding than schools in this district.

(2) Shelley Madore voted for a bill that allows convicted sex offenders and those convicted of other serious crimes to work in child care centers or nursing homes.

(3) Shelley Madore voted to increase welfare spending by over $1 billion while not voting to control waste, fraud and abuse.

(4) While facing a billion dollar deficit in 2009(?), Shelley Madore voted for $400,000 for a Brass Band Sheet Music Museum in Southeast Minnesota.

(5) Shelley Madore voted to increase state income taxes by $780 million.

(6) Shelley Madore voted to not allow any new construction of nuclear power plants in the State of Minnesota that would reduce energy costs.

(7) Shelley Madore voted for $170 million in pork barrell spending rather than fixing roads.

Notice how they always include the name of the candidate in each statement. And after each of these statements the "survey worker" would ask, "Does that statement make you more likely or less likely to vote for that candidate?"

Well, I guess to the average uninformed voter the answer would get a little obvious. All the statements have a factual premise buried in them, but they only state them in the worst possible negative way.

My wife and I kept this person on the phone. She actually was a very pleasant individual and tried to answer our questions -- truthfully I think. She was just reading a script -- she pronounced Shelley's name as "Shelley Matadore". She indicated that she thought this type of survey was being done in 4 Minnesota House Districts. When she couldn't answer the questions anymore she said, "Would you like to talk to my supervisor?". We said yes and were given to Ryan Retzlaff. He appeared to be cooperative, but said client information was confidential. We asked if he would send us the script of the survey via e-mail. Strangely enough, he said he would, however that did not happen (I would have been shocked if it came). We asked who was his immediate superior and he gave us the phone number of a Robert Macabee who also works for Western Watts.

I called that number and was connected directly to Mr. Macabee. He answered questions but was clear that he could not divulge anything about his clients. The Tarrance group is one of a number of data collectors that Western Watts works for.

I asked Mr. Macabee to define push polling. He told me that he considers push polling a large series of calls about one issue regarding a specific candidate ...usually negative...that are meant to be persuasive in nature. I asked him if they are illegal and he said that they are in some states. I described the call we received and asked him if that was a push poll. He said, "absolutely not. What we do here is called Message Testing". The surveyors ask a sampling of voters in an area to give their opinion on statements to test how a message is responded to. Our company has nothing to do with script that is given to us. We merely make the calls and disseminate the script. The number of calls would be much smaller than those of a push poll. And he reiterated, "We do not do push polls."

I think it is a little disingenuous to call that message testing. Those statements are clearly meant to form a negative opinion in the mind of the receiving party. If the "message" test response was anything other than negative, the the message obviously failed.

The negative politics that permeates the Republican party, up and down the entire ticket, is the reason the voters of this country have such a low opinion of everybody.

Yet, it will continue to thrive because it works in regards to election campaigns. A negative thought always gets remembered long after a positive one is spoken. John McCain learned this in 2000 and he has not forgotten. A desperate Minnesota Republican party has also decided to take the lowest of low roads.

comments (8) permalink


« January 2017 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.