Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Letterman Not Convinced About McCain Economic Concern

Posted: 09/24/08 18:25, Edited: 07/03/13 13:45

by Dave Mindeman

John McCain's sudden interest in getting an economic solution got Late Night talk show host David Letterman a little peeved. It happens that McCain was scheduled to appear on his show and, of course, cancelled to attend to the crisis...

Letterman's comments:

David Letterman tells audience that McCain called him today to tell him he had to rush back to DC to deal with the economy.

Then in the middle of the taping Dave got word that McCain was, in fact just down the street being interviewed by Katie Couric. Dave even cut over to the live video of the interview, and said, "Hey Senator, can I give you a ride home?"

Earlier in the show, Dave kept saying, "You don't suspend your campaign. This doesn't smell right. This isn't the way a tested hero behaves." And he joked: "I think someone's putting something in his metamucil."

"He can't run the campaign because the economy is cratering? Fine, put in your second string quarterback, Sara Palin. Where is she?"

"What are you going to do if you're elected and things get tough? Suspend being president? We've got a guy like that now!"

comments (0) permalink

Dueling Campaign Memos

Category: Presidential Politics
Posted: 09/24/08 15:51, Edited: 09/24/08 15:52

by Dave Mindeman

There is a lot of odd things going on in Presidential politcs today. We seem to be having dueling statements for attention:

First came this from Obama:

At 8:30 this morning, Senator Obama called Senator McCain to ask him if he would join in issuing a joint statement outlining their shared principles and conditions for the Treasury proposal and urging Congress and the White House to act in a bipartisan manner to pass such a proposal. At 2:30 this afternoon, Senator McCain returned Senator Obama's call and agreed to join him in issuing such a statement. The two campaigns are currently working together on the details.

Then around 2:30pm in the afternoon, McCain released this:

Tomorrow morning, I will suspend my campaign and return to Washington after speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative. I have spoken to Senator Obama and informed him of my decision and have asked him to join me.
I am calling on the President to convene a meeting with the leadership from both houses of Congress, including Senator Obama and myself. It is time for both parties to come together to solve this problem.

We must meet as Americans, not as Democrats or Republicans, and we must meet until this crisis is resolved. I am directing my campaign to work with the Obama campaign and the commission on presidential debates to delay Friday night's debate until we have taken action to address this crisis.

Was McCain afraid that the Obama initiative might look too presidential? Delaying the debate and suspending the campaign sounds pretty drastic.

To be honest, this looks like McCain desperation....
comments (1) permalink

The Barkley Effect: Watch Out Sen. Coleman

Category: Al Franken
Posted: 09/23/08 20:17

by Dave Mindeman

Dean Barkley is always a perplexing problem for Minnesota's pundit analysts. You see them on the Almanac couch with those matter of fact statements and more often than not, they are just plain wrong.

Conventional wisdom on the candidacy of Dean Barkley seems to revolve around the amount of votes that he takes away from Al Franken. But recent polling doesn't seem to match up with that assumption.

First, look at the last 3 polls without Barkley:

Sept. 21, Quinnipac Coleman 49, Franken 42
Aug. 14, Survey USA Coleman 46 Franken 39
Aug. 13, Rasmussen Coleman 49, Franken 46

Now, the last 4 polls that included Barkley:

Sept. 18, Rasmussen, Coleman 48,Franken 47, Barkley 3
Sept. 12, Star Tribune Coleman 41, Franken 37, Barkley 13
Sep. 11, Survey USA, Coleman 41, Franken 40, Barkley 14
Aug. 17 Humphry, Coleman 40, Franken 41, Barkley 8

With Barkley in the mix, the race is a virtual dead heat between Franken and Coleman. Without Barkley, Coleman gets a lead just outside the margin of error.

The Wall Street Journal did an article about the Barkley effect. Here is some of the analysis:

"Voters are sick of the nasty ads," said Mr. Barkley. "In a two-person race you can probably get away with it, but with a third viable alternative, there's a place to go. If you don't like what you're seeing, you don't have to put up with it."

Now, that is probably a fair assessment of why Barkley is getting some numbers. But where are those numbers coming from? After all, it is getting hard to know who is more negative, at least as to how the viewers perceive it.

Mr. Barkley draws voters from both parties, but many observers see his candidacy as more threatening to Mr. Franken, who has struggled to consolidate Democratic support. "He is competing with Franken for the angry voter who disapproves of Bush and sees the country as off on the wrong track," pollster Larry Jacobs, a professor at the University of Minnesota, said after early polling.

Jacobs has been in the "Franken gets hurt more" camp for quite some time. But, those polling numbers...they don't add up to that conclusion.

But here is a quote that offers more of a clue:

Mr. Barkley's emphasis on reducing the national debt may appeal to fiscal conservatives, but his opposition to the Iraq war and support of gay rights appeal to liberal voters. He says he is more than a spoiler, though, and points out that he is ahead of where Mr. Ventura was polling in the gubernatorial campaign 10 years ago.

The positions that Barkley emphasizes the most....reducing the debt...fiscal conservativism....opposition to the War....getting out of people's lives on social issues. Who does that remind you of?

Ron Paul.

I think it is possible that Barkley is beginning to tap into that disgruntled segment of the Republican Party -- the Paulites. And who got the biggest reception at the Paul counter convention at the Target Center? Jesse Ventura.

There is a connection between these two groups. And with this massive federal bailout of the banks looming, look for that connection to grow even stronger.

Coleman is all over the place on the bailout. He is not giving the Paulites the strong fiscal response they want. The dissatisfaction of this wing of the GOP party may manifest itself in a big way. And it may happen in the Senate race more than any other.

The next round of poll numbers are going to be the Almanac pundit's nightmare. And when the debates begin, I suspect the numbers will be in bigger flux.

This could get real interesting.

comments (1) permalink


« February 2017 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.