Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.



 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

IRV vs. Minnesota Voter Alliance

Category: IRV Voting
Posted: 12/20/07 16:49

by Dave Mindeman

Minneapolis voters approved IRV voting in municipal elections some time ago -- and it was a significant majority. Yet, we have a group filing a lawsuit to block it.


The Minnesota Voter Alliance is the organization behind the lawsuit. This group has another favorite issue.... political party endorsement of judges. The latter issue is heavily favored by the Republican party.... so it doesn't take a lot of dot connection to make a similar assumption about whose funding and encouraging the MN Voter Alliance.

They are claiming that IRV is not constitutional. Alright, fair enough..argue that on the merits. But I take issue with some of the other criticisms, such as:

Opponents say the instant-runoff system is confusing, open to manipulation and depresses turnout.

You get a ballot, you rank the candidates in order of preference. How confusing can that be? Open to manipulation? Frankly, I am more worried about computer voting scams than I am about any manipulation of IRV. And finally, depresses turnout? How in the world do they make that correlation? Are people going to stay away from the polls because they may be asked to make more than one check mark?

IRV has the voter rank the candidates. If you get no candidate with more than 50% of the first choice votes, you eliminate the last place candidate and add the second choice of those voters to the totals. That process continues until you have a 50% majority candidate.

That is not confusion or manipulation or voter apathy.... that is voter empowerment.

Let the courts decide its constituionality on the merits, but don't tag IRV as anything other than an improvement in voter participation.
comments (0) permalink
Next » Last»

Calendar

« November 2017 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30


Latest posts


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Comments



Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.