Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.



 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Bachmann Will Probably Run Again - And She Needs To Lose

Category: Michele Bachmann
Posted: 04/23/13 12:14

by Dave Mindeman

Erick Black wrote a somewhat controversial piece about Michele Bachmann in MinnPost today.

He speculates that Michele Bachmann has worn out her welcome with GOP operatives and that they would support her "retirement"...

Lots of Republicans say off the record that they are hearing a growing chorus of rumors that Bachmann may retire. And they are downright expansive about the fact that the party will be thrilled if she does. But absolutely no one to whom I have spoken claims to have heard it from her or from members of her innermost circle.

There is one paragraph that I noticed....

Bachmann also would be disconnected from reality if she didn?t know that she is no longer considered a rising star in Republican circles. Her presidential campaign flamed out early and left her looking fairly foolish (not that she was the only one). She provided collectors of her famed fact-challenged outbursts with many new items that will follow her into whatever future she chooses.

Now that would be a very logical observation...in normal political circumstances and with a normal politician. But Bachmann has never fit into any semblance of normal.

She IS disconnected from reality in regards to her own image. She surrounds herself with flattering magpies who agree with everything she does and look upon critics as political enemies. Although her Presidential campaign did flame out early, she has never adhered to the idea that she looked foolish. Even though her missteps are self directed, she believes in her heart that the media conspire against her. She believes, to her very soul, in her constructed conspiratorial world view, that we think of as crazy.

Foolish? Hardly. At least to her. And as for her factually challenged outbursts....well, to her they are not factually challenged or at least not to the point of admitting it. And in addition, they provide excellent fundraising opportunities when they are questioned.

I still think that Michele Bachmann will be running again. I could be wrong about that but I until she quits, I'm going to stick with it.

Look at the mechanics of it. She is still the most prolific fundraiser in the country. She represents a district that is still heavily Republican. She has never listened to Republican leadership - Washington, Minnesota or anywhere else - in regards to her political decision making. And she believes she has a religious calling to do what she does.

Those aren't the notions of a fact based, logical political candidate. They are the basics of Michele Bachmann.

There is another reason that I actually hope she runs again. I believe that her type of social conservatism ideology needs to be defeated electorally. She needs to LOSE an election. If she doesn't run again, she will still be looked to as a Party "elder". As someone whose insight has meaning because she was a winning candidate. And if she is not defeated, she will always have the opportunity to adjust her electoral image....to return to the arena after having shed some of the baggage.

If Bachmann leaves, I want it to be permanent. I don't want her "thoughts" on every political matter. I don't want her influence to continue.

Of course, if Bachmann continues to run, there is the very real possibility that she will continue to win. That she will continue to be a fixture in the Sixth District. True. But then we would be no worse off than we have been. And she can continue to be someone who causes the GOP leadership to wince at her antics. If that happens, so be it.

However, it would be so much more satisfying if Michele Bachmann would lose that next election. That she leaves on the back of a stinging loss that will forever brand her as a defeated candidate.

Michele Bachmann needs that. She, and her philosophy, need to lose.
comments (0) permalink

Michele Bachmann Is Back - Literally - Part Deux

Category: Michele Bachmann
Posted: 03/22/13 14:26

by Dave Mindeman

When you watch Republicans, well when you watch Michele Bachmann anyway, it gets pretty hard to figure out the exact definition of earmark.

Generally its supposed to be any spending appropriation that is tacked onto a regular budget bill by a Congressional member. Most call any spending of that nature an earmark.

John Kline feels that way. Michele Bachmann feels that way when its convenient for her.

She is getting called out for her I-94 spending request. Trying hard to look like she is doing something for her district, she uses the media to pretend she is doing her job.

?It?s a very important issue for people in the district. And I?ve talked to him (House Transportation Committee Chairman Bill Shuster) to put it on his radar screen to let him know this is something we?d like to see,? Bachmann said. ?I?m not talking for an earmark. We have rules in the House of how we deal with this.?

So that is NOT an earmark? So what do you call it?

A Minnesota newspaper quoted her this week saying the initiative was gaining ?traction? with the chairman..... But it?s not clear what that ?traction? could mean in the face of the moratorium against congressionally directed spending on specific projects, and on Thursday she told POLITICO that her conversations with the powerful Pennsylvanian aren?t about asking for an earmark, but ?raising awareness.?

Not an earmark. Not a spending request. It's "raising awareness".

Our 6th District Congresswoman is "literal" about Obamacare but can't "literally" call a spending request, actual spending.

Got it figured out?
comments (0) permalink

Michele Bachmann Is Back - Literally

Category: Michele Bachmann
Posted: 03/22/13 12:36, Edited: 03/22/13 15:08

by Dave Mindeman

It looks like an open and shut case. The evidence is strong and soon those responsible for this crime spree will be arrested.

Yes, the criminal endeavors of "OBAMACARE" will soon be over.

Fearless Congressional crimefighter, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann has been on the case for years. Gathering evidence, issuing warnings....and a few days ago she broke the story....

?Let?s repeal this failure before it literally kills women, kills children, kills senior citizens. Let?s not do that. Let?s love people, let?s care about people, let?s repeal it now while we can.?

Yes, there you have it. The accusation was full throated and unequivocal. No less a credible source than a Congressperson (after all the voters would never elect someone who makes stuff up....would they?), has put the final nail in the coffin.

Obamacare LITERALLY kills women. It LITERALLY kills senior citizens. It LITERALLY kills children.

LITERALLY. A Congressperson doesn't use the word literally unless it is a literal event. Actuality. A truth. A Bachmannistic reality.

The killing spree is at hand. Thank heavens we have Michele Bachmann as our watchdog. Looking out for those wasteful dog walkers in the White House. Those extravagant meals at the White House dinner table.

All the while, the President's policy is LITERALLY killing people.

Oh, the humanity.
comments (1) permalink
« First « Previous

Calendar

« May 2013 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31


Latest posts


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Comments



Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.