Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

The Ukrainian Dilemma

Category: Barack Obama
Posted: 03/02/14 17:46, Edited: 03/02/14 17:46

by Dave Mindeman

I couldn't help but notice something that Secretary John Kerry said this morning on Meet the Press...

"You just don't invade a sovereign country on trumped up charges to assert your own interests..."

I'm not sure he got the irony, but essentially, the US has lost the high ground compass on the political argument here.

Putin has a Cold War mentality and he longs to reunite much of the Old Soviet Union. In addition, the Crimea is home to a strategic Russian naval base.

None of that makes what he has done acceptable as "national interest", but governments have used less to justify their actions.

The whole Ukraine situation has plenty of complications. The deposed leader WAS democratically elected. Russian will use that as a talking point. He was removed from power in an arguably undemocratic way - almost resembling a coup. Was it justified? You probably won't find much agreement on that. But Russia's use of force to intervene is still an unacceptable international norm and western protests must focus on that.

Obama has some hard decisions to make. But even before he has begun to deliberate, the GOP is, AGAIN, using a foreign policy crisis as a means to score political points. Obama will be wrong (to them) on whatever he chooses to do. And that will also weaken what he does. Republicans desperately want to return to being the party of strong foreign policy. Allowing Obama to make decisions unchallenged is no longer allowed - from their point of view.

John McCain and Lindsay Graham always want to opt for intervention. I shudder to think how many conflicts we would be managing right now if McCain had been elected in 2008. This nation is war weary and while sabre rattling may be good for the ego, it will only lead to more tension we are not prepared to back up.

President Obama doesn't have many good options, but I suspect he will deliberate on all of them very carefully and make the proper decision. He is not quick to war - he doesn't force adversaries into corners.

He will take the best action in our best interest. He will have to ignore the critics with political motives - good Presidents do.
comments (1) permalink

Can Congress Act?

Category: Barack Obama
Posted: 02/13/13 00:05

by Dave Mindeman

While listening to the State of the Union speech I found myself almost dozing off at the early economic proposals. Yeah, Yeah, heard that, watched it die in the House. Been there.

But then, suddenly in the second half, there was actual passion. Passion on voting rights, on gun legislation, on minimum wage.

It got my attention. Finally, something we can sink our teeth into.

Can we actually do any of this? Can the President make the Congress move...or at least get them to quit sitting on their hands like the Republicans always do during these speeches?

Yes, Mr. President, they deserve a vote. All of them. Gun violence victims. Poverty stricken minimum wagers. Tired and beleaguered voters.

They all want action. They all want something done.

Can Congress act?
comments (3) permalink

It Wasn't A Tie

Category: Barack Obama
Posted: 11/24/12 15:10

by Dave Mindeman

It wasn't a "tie".

I think it's time we dispensed with this...the election was a tie theory. We heard it so often from pundits and pollsters prior to election day, that we have assumed it is true. But the facts tell us otherwise.

As the numbers slowly trickled in, Obama ended up with about 62.6 million votes. Romney had just over 59.1 million. 50.8 - 47.8. A full 3% margin. Maybe that doesn't sound like much but take a look at the 2004 Bush victory....

Bush had just over 62 million votes, while Kerry had just over 59 million. The margin was 50.7 to 48.3 or 2.4%. Republicans didn't consider that a "squeaker"....in fact Bush said he earned "capital" from that win.

The fact is that the 2004 election is the only election where a Republican nominee won the popular vote since 1988 (Bush's father). Gore won the popular vote in 2000.

So, let's forget about calling it even.

It wasn't.
comments (1) permalink
« First « Previous


« April 2014 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.