Posted: 09/01/10 19:43, Edited: 09/01/10 19:45
by Dave Mindeman
Luke Hellier over at Minnesota Democrats Exposed got himself into a lather over the divorce records of Mark Dayton. He went into post after post about releasing these "unsealed" documents -- Republican translation: He has something embarrassing in there and we want it. He even got to ask Dayton a question about it at a press conference -- God knows how he got a pass for that -- and a local journalist even asked a follow up question. It was yet another embarrassment for the local press.
And, as usual, Hellier tries to whip up his echo chamber to draw attention to his loosely researched story. He even got PowerLine to gleefully comment on this "mystery".
But Powerline puts an addendum on this post. It goes like this:
CORRECTION: Luke Hellier has corrected his MDE post to reflect that the affidavits were removed from the court file by the attorney for Dayton's wife, not by the attorney for Dayton. That seems to me to make it more likely that the affidavits raised issues personally sensitive to Dayton's wife rather than to Dayton. I regret the error.
I regret the error?
Unfortunately, the blogger/press that masquerades as media around here should be issuing a lot more "regrets" than that.
Item #1. Hellier on Minnesota Democrats Exposed continues to post about this issue...with no "regrets" listed.
Item #2. The usually reliable Doug Grow felt compelled to add this bizarre exchange to his story about Dayton getting the Police endorsement. At present, this story has no "regrets" listed.
Item #3. Pat Kessler was the reporter who asked the follow up on this out of the blue fishing expedition, which had no reliable information whatsoever. But, again, no "regrets" forthcoming.
I'm not sure I understand what journalism is today. Have the budgets become so arbitrarily small that reporters find it difficult to budget actual research of their own? Are they compelled to follow every slashing, Hail Mary charge that political parties throw out there?
Powerline is a blog that gets a lot of attention. But the general idea of the Dayton post is left intact.
Still, it does have those four words which are supposed to exonerate any wrongdoing.....
"I regret the error."



