Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Yes To A Gas Tax

Category: Mark Dayton
Posted: 01/23/16 13:11

by Dave Mindeman

Well, Governor Dayton said something he will get into trouble for.....

Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton says a gas tax increase to fund road and bridge repairs should still be on the table.

Gasp! (Republican eyerolling ensues)

But, as I have tried to point out before, a gas tax, in the current environment, is absolutely the right thing to do.

We are struggling to pay for infrastructure. The Republicans have already decided that they will shift spending away from other needs to roads and bridges (leaving other departments holding the bag and leaving transit high and dry) and take on more borrowing (while we are already talking about a bonding bill).

The Senate is a bit more open to the idea of a gas tax, but I suspect that Senator Bakk has probably already traded that one away.

With gas prices at these kind of levels, we should be increasing the state gas tax immediately. Sure, prices will eventually go back up, but in the mean time, use the opportunity to collect revenue that is already dedicated to roads and bridges. Sunset the tax provision or tie it to a certain price level - and it can go away. But just do it.

There is an additional benefit to raising the gas tax. When prices are this low, people are tempted to over consume (which adds to environmental pressure) and to purchase bigger vehicles, which increases consumption beyond the current price environment.

Dayton is right. Let's discuss it....look at it....act on it.

Roads and bridges are not getting any better.
comments (1) permalink

2015 Session:Lost Opportunities for Dems Thanks To Sen. Bakk

Category: Mark Dayton
Posted: 06/09/15 20:22, Edited: 06/09/15 20:24

by Dave Mindeman

Governor Dayton decided to end his holdout on the State Auditor language and press ahead on some other issues prior to a special session.

I expected this would happen. Although I admire the Governor's intentions and motives, he was sitting out on a limb without the key support he needed.

And when I say support, I mean Majority Leader Tom Bakk.

Time after time in this legislative session, Tom Bakk has undermined DFL positions. When the Democrats should have had the higher degree of influence, Senator Bakk was dealing with the other side for a different agenda.

The Commissioner salary issue was only the beginning. In nearly every instance in regards to policy, Governor Dayton and the House Democrats were on their own.

Senator Bakk advocates for his region. And that, by itself, is fine - in fact, admirable. But he is supposed to be in a more general leadership position. He has a responsibility to work with the House minority and the Governor. But way to often he was at odds with one or the other or both.

His "deal" making with Daudt gave the House Republicans a much more persuasive argument about bipartisan stances and the wrong type of united front in confronting the Governor on end of session positions.

The Governor stood alone. The House minority gamely tried to give Dayton support, but, as we well know, a House minority has little opportunity to have an impact on final negotiations.

Which brings us back to Bakk once more. If he had stood with the House, their ideas would have had more influence and merit. And if Bakk had even tried to stand with the Governor's positions, better compromises would have been possible.

The session was disappointing and a large step backward from the progress that was made inn 2014.

Bakk has not been very visible during these last days - probably because he would have to be continuously explaining why he gave tacit approval to the House GOP's agenda.

Democrats need to remember this. I hope the rank and file Senators in the DFL caucus are not damaged by this ridiculous personal power play by a man who uses power for personal politics.

Democrats could have gone into 2016 with a renewed opportunity to take back control of the reins of government. But thanks to Bakk, we now have to hope we can hold on to what we still have.

Democrats deserved better than this. Governor Dayton deserved better than this.

As for Bakk, let's consider this a lesson learned that this man cannot be trusted.

Now we have to try to move ahead with damage control.
comments (0) permalink

To Speaker Daudt: Leadership Is A Two Way Street

Category: Mark Dayton
Posted: 06/08/15 13:36

by Dave Mindeman

Speaker Kurt Daudt thinks that Dayton should "come to his senses"...

"My guess is that the governor is going to come to his senses and say, 'You know what, it is time for us to do what's best for the 94,000 Minnesotans that don't have certainty on their jobs, the farmers in Minnesota that don't have certainty on avian flu relief, the steel worker on the Iron Range that don't have unemployment benefits and for the communities waiting for flood relief...I think the governor is going to say I'm going to be a leader."

Apparently, Speaker Daudt has forgotton that this "leader" thing is a two way street.

Dayton wants the Auditor change for valid reasons. Yes, he signed the overall bill because he was concerned about the number of government layoffs another veto would increase. But the auditor provision was rammed through on questionable grounds. Yes, it had Senate leadership on board, but the rest of the caucus is not so solidly on board. Some voted for the ball and then called for a veto. But the bottom line is that the legislative branch is dictating terms to the executive branch regarding an executive office.

If this stays it will have to be challenged in court.

So everything that Daudt says about Dayton being a leader applies to Daudt as well.

Does he want to push the issue to the brink and hold up state government to maintain a couple of lines in a bill that has questionable Constitutional validity? That is a valid leadership question as well.

Frankly, the Governor has agreed to many issues - he has compromised on a variety of policy points. But he has drawn a line in regards to the auditor language....and he signed the bill with an expectation that he would be respected in regards to a policy discussion on this one point.

I guess that was wishful thinking. Speaker Daudt doesn't feel the need to respect the Governor. His party controls one House of one branch of government and yet he thinks he can dictate the terms.

Daudt, himself, talks as if it shouldn't be a big deal for Dayton to accept the situation as is. Not worth noting. Certainly not worth holding up the government.

So that thought process can't be turned around? Dayton can't be expected to get any compromise from the House GOP? The GOP is willing to hold the government hostage over a single provision?

Is the Speaker thinking of those Minnesotans affected as well?

Leadership is a two way street.
comments (2) permalink
« First « Previous


« July 2016 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.