Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Special Prosecutor In Police Shootings - A Worthy Conversation

Category: Legislation
Posted: 04/13/16 08:11, Edited: 04/13/16 08:11

by Dave Mindeman

Sen. Scott Dibble has proposed legislation "that a special prosecutor be created to handle every case in which police use deadly force."

I believe this is a very good idea.

Here is a summation...

The proposal would route every officer-involved incident that causes great bodily harm to a newly created special prosecutor's office for investigation and a decision on whether the officers should face any charges.

Sen. Scott Dibble, a Minneapolis Democrat and the bill's chief proponent, said the proposal is not a response specifically to the outcome after Jamar Clark's death but a move to address the attention on officer-involved deaths nationwide and remove doubt about a judicial process that critics complain lacks accountability and too often leads to no charges against officers. He called it an extra layer of independence.

Here is why this is necessary. Law enforcement depends on the trust of the citizens they serve. That trust is under suspicion. Until we can remedy that situation, we need to have a method of examination (in cases of officer shootings) that is outside the normal pathways within the system.

A special prosecutor's office that has no direct ties to the police, the city, or the county attorney, would be given jurisdiction. How that office is staffed and organized needs to have input from all parties - citizens, police administration, and the city.

Whether this lack of trust in the police department is deserved is pretty irrelevant. If the citizens don't have that trust, then we need to find a method to repair it.

Senator Dibble's proposal will not get through this session, but the conversation needs to get started. This is just one aspect of racial disparities in the justice system that can be addressed, but it is a critical one.

When trust between the police and the community is broken, we have a public safety problem. For all of us.
comments (0) permalink

Transparency Forecast Is Overcast And Gloomy

Category: Legislation
Posted: 05/14/15 09:57

by Dave Mindeman

Whatever happened to transparency?

For all the political rhetoric that goes on about the public's right to know, we sure have the seeming necessity for a lot of secrets.

We have a legislative session that starts in January. We have several months of partisan barbs and a lot of posturing and then when the session is about to expire, we put three guys in a room to decide the budget for all of us.

And how can the two sides be this far apart, this late? What was the point of holding all those hearings and all those sessions, only to end up with stances that could have been predicted 2 years ago?

All of this secrecy extends to the press. It always happens. As they start the "behind closed doors" sessions, they tell us that dueling press conferences are not productive. We just can't talk to the press anymore. Well, here's a suggestion - talk substance and not political talking points. Decide that your purpose for coming in front of a microphone is for information, not bashing the other side.

Divided government? Its a joke. Republicans and Democrats use each other to delay and divide....to use government for political purposes. They say that we, the people, are involved...but its a lie. They use polling data only when it fits their current agenda. They ignore us when we don't agree with them. They cloud the question to get the result they really want.

And don't forget special interests. For all of that closed door secrecy, it is amazing how the groups that matter get the first trial balloons that move toward agreements.

I know I should be used to all of this by now. It hasn't changed in years and gets worse after each election. But it is irritating to watch government working behind locked doors - in the hands of fewer and fewer people as government workings grind on.

The sun doesn't shine on these proceedings....and the forecast is overcast and gloomy for the foreseeable future.
comments (2) permalink

Rep. Roz Peterson: New Heights Of Hypocrisy

Category: Legislation
Posted: 02/14/15 12:07, Edited: 02/14/15 12:09

by Dave Mindeman

Rep. Roz Peterson has an interesting hypocritical streak.

During the Commissioner salary kerfuffle, she has been an outspoken critic of Governor Dayton's decision to bring Commissioner salaries in line with the private sector. This meant some hefty one time raises - but considering that there had been an effective wage freeze for 12 years, the salary increases seem reasonable compared to the importance of the position.

Roz Peterson wants to take away the Governor's authority to set those salaries. An authority granted him by the legislature....which intended for him to find a way to get and keep good people for these positions.

Roz Peterson is also a hypocrite. As chair of the Lakeville School Board, she approved an raise for that district's superintendent to $187,000 plus a bonus. That would give the Lakeville superintendent, in charge of one school district, a salary that is significantly higher than the Commissioner of Education - even after the raise.

Yesterday, Peterson was quoted:

"At a time when take-home pay for families remains flat and some Minnesotans are still struggling to make ends meet, it's outrageous that the governor would approve enormous salary increases for commissioners and political appointees already making six-figure salaries."

Well, I guess the same could be said about the Lakeville superintendent, but apparently Roz Peterson is able to compartmentalize all of that.

Then their is the matter of "open meetings".

A "secret vote" by the Lakeville school board has called into question whether the board violated Minnesota's open-meeting law and has some residents demanding greater transparency. The six-member board took an anonymous vote earlier this month on which of them should be the next chairperson, vice chair, treasurer and clerk. Each member cast a ballot and outgoing chairwoman Roz Peterson tallied them. The vote was done during an open session, but who voted for whom wasn't shared since they didn't sign the ballots.

Now the excuse was that this was not an "official" vote because final action could not be taken until the January meeting. And the board thought it would avoid "animosity" going forward.

But, it also gave Roz Peterson, the outgoing chair, a chance to weigh in on her successor - and an ability to lobby for her personal choice if the vote leaned toward someone else.

The anonymous ballot was Peterson's idea, Volk said she believes. It was a way to "smooth things over with the board because it gets pretty personal."

Peterson pulled this secret/public thing again as the new legislator from her district....

Freshman Republican Representative Roz Peterson held a property tax listening session in Burnsville earlier this week. She advertised the public event through her official legislative email, her official Facebook page, and in the local paper. But then, at the event, they kicked a person affiliated with ABM out of the event.

I guess it was a "public" event in a sorta kinda way.

Roz Peterson advertised her listening session as a public event, but then at the door, Rep. Steve Drazkowski treated it like a private event, deciding who could and could not enter.

Roz Peterson seems to have standards regarding public service. There is the "Roz Peterson" standard and then there is the standard for the rest of us.

Peterson was the only Republican legislator that managed to defeat an incumbent DFLer in the suburbs during the last election. Because of that, the majority GOP House caucus is trying to give her a high profile.

But when you look at her record, that profile is pretty hypocritical and suspect. Every criticism she makes seems to reflect a flaw in her own record.

Roz Peterson is giving us a new standard in hypocrisy.
comments (0) permalink
« First « Previous


« May 2016 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.