Posted: 05/09/16 14:20
by Dave Mindeman
Over the years I have gravitated from a liberal ideologue to a results pragmatist. I know that a lot of people hate labels but this is more of a message centered thought process than some sort of principled liberal stand.
I am very happy to see the progressive idealistic surge...most of it fueled by the candidacy of Bernie Sanders. He has resurrected the old style liberalism that went into dormancy during the Reagan years.
It has emerged with a vengeance but shows the same purity test that doomed the movement in the late sixties and early seventies.
The Democratic Party is the focal part of the liberal base. But just as the Republican Party is not only about conservatism (as they are finding out all too well right now), the Democrats are not only about liberal, progressive thought.
The two party system has a way of roughing out the edges by the larger tent philosophy. This is the main difference between this country and the European parliamentary system. We rough out the edges within the party while Europe roughs out the edges in a messier end game finding a ruling majority.
Ideologues feel the need to control the party they are working in. The Republicans have been working their way through this process over the past several cycles. Unfortunately for them, the extremes in their party have found a way to really, actually control the process - and this resulted in Donald Trump.
In the Democratic Party, we are going through this process as well.
I consider myself very liberal. But I am also not naive enough to think that I have ideas that are part of a majority opinion. As I have moved into a more pragmatic thought process, I have looked for common ground. For areas that can move good ideas forward. I don't expect the perfect - but I do want the better.
I understand the disappointments people feel when their ideas or their candidates do not rise to the political level they expect. I have been there. I have had my share of major disappointments. But the edges continue to get smoothed out. We move on.
This year has been an anomaly. Trump is a jagged edge that made it through the party process. He benefited from an incredible series of events and used taboo rhetoric and process to establish a different type of candidacy in a year when all of our institutions have been questioned.
Bernie Sanders has vaulted forward under similar circumstances. He has shaken up the system and raised the ideology bar, but, in this case, will probably fall a bit short. But what he has done has contributed that edge that has changed the amount of smoothing out the party will end up with. He has done what an insurgent candidate campaign should do - he has added to Democratic politics, not subtracted.
Even though Hillary Clinton will probably be the nominee, she will be a different candidate than she would have been prior to the Sanders challenge. The pragmatist in me is appreciative of that. We don't have to just settle, we can accept the refinement and move ahead with a better message and agenda.
Bernie has been very tempting for a lot of liberal minded people. He has been that reform minded liberal that progressives have looked for and speaks with the confidence that all things are possible.
While that can be a resonant message within a party that leans that way anyway, it is difficult to see that same confidence level reaching a general electorate. Hillary Clinton has always respected that concept. When she seems to be hedging against a liberal agenda, it is because she sees how that plays to the broader pool of voters. Bernie has moved her ideas to the left (a place that I believe she is naturally inclined), but she tempers it and adds nuances that may seem like cop outs to the ideology, but really are trying to move an agenda into a complex political environment.
That has become the way of the results pragmatist. Look at the ACA. Obama could not get single payer through Congress. He even tried an end around on that with a government option. That didn't happen. But he persevered to expand health coverage to more of our citizens. It did away with pre-existing conditions, insurance caps, exclusions on preventative care, etc. It has been messy and not without a lot of frustrating backslides that have slowed everything down, but it has improved the lives of the formerly uninsured.
If ideal legislation is never going to become law, what good is it? We can get angry and ratchet up the rhetoric and complain bitterly, but what have we accomplished? Nothing.
So finding methods that that can improve how government works and improve the lives of our people are the real agenda we need to be involved with. It is not always smooth, in fact it is downright messy and frustrating, but, in the end, it is the way to get results.
And results are what really matters.