Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.



 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Taking Stock Of Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District Race

Category: Congressional Races
Posted: 07/19/15 19:43

by Dave Mindeman

Alright you DFLers in the 2nd District. I am going to share some idea (Postive and Negative) thoughts I have about our 2nd District Congressional candidates, and the race in general, and I want you to help with some explanations.

I don't have particularly strong feelings on any of this, but let's just say I'm thinking out loud. So here goes....

Mary Lawrence - It would seem that Lawrence is willing to commit a good deal of her own resources into her 2nd District run. According to the financial report, she has "loaned" the campaign about $800,000. That is a lot of money. Still, a full commitment will be more evident if she actually puts that money into action within the district.

As to the other funds that she has raised (a bit more modest), a lot of it comes from Wall Street. Donors from Bain Capital, Vestar Capital Partners, Williams Capital Group, Ameriprise Financial, Morgan Stanley, JANA Partners, AIG, Century Park Capital, Black Rock...pepper her financial report. Their are other corporates like Robert Pohlad of Pepsi Americas and Michael White of DIRECTV. (I could not help but notice a $250 contribution from the CFO of PolyMet mining.) And yes, there are some significant small donors through ACT BLUE.

I imagine it is hard to raise the kind of sums needed without tapping into corporate contacts. That seems to be where we are at in this campaign finance world. But it still is hard to imagine that a person can head to Congress and make purely independent decisions with corporate baggage trailing your every move.

Lawrence makes no secret that she will be a pro-business candidate. We will have to let her tell us what that means. Will she back higher minimum wages? Will she support labor in forming more unions? Will she hold the banks accountable? Those questions need to be answered during this campaign.

In addition, Lawrence should make an honest statement about her plan for the endorsement. She may lose some support with an open move to a primary, but I've always felt that pretense on seeking an endorsement is worse. Appearances say she will opt to run in the primary.

I would like to hear some candor....but right now I don't hear much of anything.

Angie Craig - Craig's donor list is built largely with ACT BLUE, but her bigger donors are peppered with St. Jude executives, although that is understandable since that has been her place of employment for a number of years. Other larger donors are more diversified and come from a broader range of professions. The donations are not as large as the ones that appear in the Lawrence report. And Craig has a more modest $7600 in personal loans to the campaign.

Craig is committed to the endorsement. It is the basis of her strategy. And she can make the claim that she outraised Kline during the last cycle. A claim that few who run against him can make. But Craig only has $230,000 cash on hand. Kline has double that and Lawrence, with her $1 million in the bank, could dwarf all of them, should she decide to really spend some of those resources.

Craig will need to keep up with monetary expectations and maintaining that kind of pace will be a challenge. Especially when she will have a possible primary campaign to wage, while Kline watches with token opposition.

She seems like a very progressive candidate. The majority of her issues take the progressive view. She stands with the ACA with the possible exception of the repeal of the Medical Device Tax - (she has clearly stated her support of Erik Paulsen's repeal action) - but overall that seems to be a corporate aberration rather than a sign of supporting corporate ideas.

******************************************************
There is a different dynamic in play for the 2nd District. One of my concerns is the lack of political experience that both candidates have. Mary Lawrence has had significant political connections but she is not very polished in her interactions with the various DFL units...and has not been a resident in this district very long. Craig is more personable but is also a political neophyte and it remains to be seen as to whether or not she can get into the trenches with Kline and stay afloat.

Craig has significant endorsements, including Mike Obermueller who ran against Kline in the last two cycles. Lawrence would seem to have more potential financial resources - especially if she is willing to utilize her own financial wealth, as the early report would seem to indicate.

Looming ahead of them is John Kline. He generally chooses to ignore his opponent until the campaign season gets into full swing. He bottles himself up in his Washington cocoon and stays above the fray. The key to success in taking on John Kline is to get him to engage...to force him to address his record and statements....to make him feel some pressure.

He does not react well to pressure.

It has been good to see some early action in the 2nd District. To see candidates willing to take this race seriously.

How much the 2nd District is in play will be more evident early next year. But the signs are encouraging in that regard.
comments (1) permalink

It's The Money, Stupid!

Category: Congressional Races
Posted: 07/17/15 02:13

by Dave Mindeman

In the politics section of MPR, reporter Catherine Richert did a posting on the 2nd District money race.

It was accurate and timely, but how come it takes money to get any kind of discussion going? and why can't it be about issues and not just the dollars?

Angie Craig and Mary Lawrence both had favorable money totals in comparison to John Kline. Craig's contributions from others outpace even Kline himself...and that is worth noting. But any kind of substance about the issues involved in the second district seemed to be lacking. The few notations that came up were tangential.

When Richert talked about outside donors, she did mention the large donations to Kline from the ForProfit college industry...but there was no mention of how much Kline influences legislation that affects that industry. And no follow up with Kline himself.

And Richert seemed to be implying that Craig's donations were just as much from outside groups even though she quoted the spokesman press release that noted 400 out of over 1000 individual donnors were outside Minnesota. In today's money appeals, that seems pretty normal.

The entire article was derived from press releases and FEC reports. Only press release quotes were used to denote candidate input.

Wouldn't it be appropriate for a news report to look for candidate reactions and deeper explanations of these reports? Shouldn't there be more of a dialogue to inform the electorate?

Money pervades so many aspects of campaigns these days that the money becomes the story.

Yes, the 2nd District DFL candidates are doing well in the money race, but shouldn't there be more substance to all of this than dollar signs?

No wonder the press hovers over every Trump utterance.
comments (1) permalink

CD2: Mary Lawrence And Her Personal Campaign Contributions

Category: Congressional Races
Posted: 05/22/15 15:26

by Dave Mindeman

I got a message recently, from a local DFL activist, upset about this discovery while searching OpenSecrets.....

http://www.mnpact.org/sblog/upload/Lawrence%20contribution.jpg

Here is a Congressional District 2 candidate who had given money to Mitt Romney during his first Presidential run. I have to admit that it puzzled me as well. So, I had to do some digging.

I did try to contact the Lawrence campaign as I thought there might be a very simple explanation. I left a message - got a brief e-mail from the campaign manager, told them what I was asking about, and then got no response.

So, I went back to digging.

Now Jim and Mary Lawrence have been very, very generous to Democratic candidates. They have been particularly generous in supporting Senate candidates - its a long list. Klobuchar, Franken, Heitkamp, Kaine, McCaskill, Warner...(and not just token contributions, it is often the Federal individual maximum of $2500) they even gave $10,000 contributions to Democratic State Parties in Minnesota, Missouri, Virginia.

But in the middle of all that Democratic money, there sits these contributions to Mitt Romney from both of them. (Along with some small donations to Norm Coleman and Jim Ramstad that go way back - supporting "centrist, establishment Republicans";). I thought, there must be more to it than that.

A little more digging.

So as I looked at the timelines and the biographies, I found a connection that may make some sense - (although it would be nice to get it directly from the candidate). But it looks like James Lawrence at one time worked for Bain. Which, I assume, would mean an individual relationship with Mitt Romney in a working context. Maybe they were friends. Maybe they even argued politics. But giving a donation to someone you know is logical, even if they are from the other party....and even if that person is running for President against a Democrat you support (there are Obama contributions).

So, to me that seems to explain this a bit - and is worthy of acceptance.

As I researched, I found a few other interesting things. It seems that James had been courted by the DCCC to run against Erik Paulsen in the third district for 2014. Minnpost did an article. They even did some of that issue polling....you know, the stuff where they test issues against the incumbent, without naming any names. It would seem that nothing really came of it....or Mr. Lawrence decided against the possibility.

Another curious thing, in the Open Secrets list, is something called Politics Reimagined.

This looks like an individual project that James Lawrence started as a means of breaking through the gridlock. (Both James and Mary seem to focus on Congressional gridlock as a core issue for them.) Politics Reimagined was a SuperPac meant to work in the 2014 election cycle dealing with this goal....

Our goal is to formulate a centrist, bipartisan platform that addresses issues important for all Americans. With your support, we can encourage collaboration over contestation among candidates we support in order to make these goals realized and implemented.

The idea was to help elect "reasonable" people in either party who were committed to working across the aisle. It was clear that both Republicans and Democrats who met the criteria would be helped.

Lawrence initially funded this with $50,000 of his own money.

But as far as I can tell, it never went any further. There are few donations over that initial $50,000 and the project now seems to be abandoned. (Although the website is still here ) The PAC only spent a little over $30,000 during the 2014 cycle.

So, that is what I could glean from what initially seemed like an odd Republican contribution from a Democratic Congressional candidate.

I have been a little concerned, that outside of an announcement at the Congressional District 2 Central Committee, there hasn't been much visibility for Mary Lawrence. Outside of some press releases on Veterans Issues and one on Student Debt, we don't know much about her positions. I know it is early and I guess that shouldn't be a cause for concern - but given this centrist leaning, it raises a question in my mind as to whether or not she will abide by the endorsement.

If the campaign is listening, maybe we could talk?
comments (2) permalink
« First « Previous

Calendar

« September 2015 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30


Latest posts


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Comments



Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.