Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

site search

Site Meter
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

GOP Prez: Answering Only The Questions They Want To Hear

Category: GOP Presidential Candidates
Posted: 10/30/15 12:22, Edited: 10/30/15 12:49

by Dave Mindeman

During the GOP debate, there was a lot of back and forth criticism about the moderators and their questions. It has become a regular theme with the GOP candidates. Ted Cruz got special props for his rant about the media, but let's take a look at the question he got that prompted this....

Senator Cruz. Congressional Republicans, Democrats and the White House are about to strike a compromise that would raise the debt limit, prevent a government shutdown and calm financial markets that fear of -- another Washington-created crisis is on the way. Does your opposition to it show that you're not the kind of problem-solver American voters want?

Cruz never did answer that question. He was too busy giving his rehearsed media rant. But there was nothing wrong with the question...in fact, we should still demand that Cruz answer it. If he is going to go to Washington and expect to accomplish anything, then how he deals with the budget bill that passed the House is entirely relevant. His opposition requires an explanation and an alternative method for moving forward.

But Cruz ignored the question and critiqued the debate up to that point....

You know, let me say something at the outset. The questions that have been asked so far in this debate illustrate why the American people don't trust the media. (APPLAUSE) This is not a cage match. And, you look at the questions -- "Donald Trump, are you a comic-book villain?" "Ben Carson, can you do math?" "John Kasich, will you insult two people over here?" "Marco Rubio, why don't you resign?" "Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen?" How about talking about the substantive issues the people care about?

People don't care about the US budget...or the debt limit...or a government shutdown?

But as for Cruz' characterization of the questions given to the other candidates, let's take a look...

Trump: The moderator outlined his past statements on "building a wall"; on cutting taxes $10 trillion without a debt increase; and his constant referral to the stupidity and incompetance of our leaders. The question closed with - "Is this a comic book version of a presidential campaign?"

Maybe the comic book reference was over the top, but asking about Trump's past statements was completely relevant and worthy of an answer....and to which Trump gave his usual non-specific bluster responses.

Carson: Here was his question....

You have a flat tax plan of 10 percent flat taxes, and -- I've looked at it -- and this is something that is very appealing to a lot of voters, but I've had a really tough time trying to make the math work on this. If you were to took a 10 percent tax, with the numbers right now in total personal income, you're gonna come in with bring in $1.5 trillion. That is less than half of what we bring in right now. And by the way, it's gonna leave us in a $2 trillion hole. So what analysis got you to the point where you think this will work?

A relevant question? I think so. The numbers do not add up. They don't. And Carson response was more rambling with changes to his answers and a lot of "estimates" about how this would all fit. If Carson thinks this is an economic answer of any kind, then we should be concerned.

Kasich: The moderator merely referred to statements that John Kasich had made on the previous day in which he said he was "fed up" with the statements of the two front runners. The moderator asked him:

"..you had some very strong words to say yesterday about what's happening in your party and what you're hearing from the two gentlemen we've just heard from. Would you repeat it?"

Asking the candidate to clarify and expand about a controversial statement would seem like a fair question. Especially when the people he is referring to have a direct chance to respond.

Rubio: In this case, the moderators were merely referring to a controversial newspaper editorial which called on Rubio to resign his senate seat for missing too many Senate votes. A legitimate question and one which Rubio was prepared to respond to. In fact, the question helped Rubio to put out any fire that editorial could have caused.

Bush: Asking Jeb Bush to respond to the flurry of media speculation about his falling poll numbers also seemed relevant. And Bush needed to address that publicly anyway before the speculation got out of control. His main problem is that his performance only fueled the speculation. But the idea that the question was the problem is ludicrous.

So that was the supposed substance of the Ted Cruz rant. The Republican audience gave him wild applause for his put down of the questioning.

But the reality of this is that what Cruz is really saying is that GOP candidates don't want to answer relevant questions about "substantive" issues....they only want to answer questions that allow them to give their own chosen responses.

The Democratic debate dealt with immigration, guns, budgets, women's rights, and foreign policy. Yet, Cruz insinuated that they were given preferential treatment by the "main stream media".

If you are going to take up all of your response time by criticizing the question, it doesn't seem to be productive.

By the way, Senator Cruz, how would you deal with the debt limit?
comments (0) permalink

GOP Debate Tonight - More Crazy Time

Category: GOP Presidential Candidates
Posted: 10/28/15 14:12

by Dave Mindeman

Tonight is another episode of the ongoing reality show that pretends to be a presidential debate.

I have trouble fathoming how the Republican primary electorate can actually believe that its two best candidates are Donald Trump and Ben Carson.

I just cannot take it seriously.

Donald Trump thinks everything in government relates to the best deal. Ben Carson thinks governing and religion are mixable....and that it is necessary to mix them.

I cannot imagine either of them as a real President. Yet there they sit...atop the Republican polls...with nobody even close. It's crazy.

And even though I did not think it possible, Ben Carson is worse than Donald Trump. I mean frighteningly worse.

Carson's ideas can't be explained as anything other than nutty. I watched him do an interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday and I struggled (along with Wallace) trying to understand what he even meant. He babbled about how he was going to change Medicare with Health Savings accounts and it made zero sense. Really - zero.

Carson wants to utilize the "smart" people to set up his policies...and Trump watches the news shows to decide on foreign policy.


So, tonight we will probably get to see the Carson, Trump show....and if the past is any indication, it won't matter how crazy they sound or how garbled the policy - because as long as they keep insulting government, they will stay on top.

And so it goes......
comments (0) permalink

Today's GOP: A Quicksand Foundation

Category: GOP Presidential Candidates
Posted: 09/29/15 12:43

by Dave Mindeman

The rise of Carly Fiorina in the Republican polls is another symptom that the Republican Party has a foundation of quicksand.

Fiorina has no government experience. She obtained her wealth at the expense of the working class. She accomplished virtually nothing during her tenure as the head of a major corporation. She uses doctored facts to try to enhance her record. And she embellishes the truth, or outright lies, regarding many things, but especially when it comes to Planned Parenthood.

The idea that the Republican Party primary voters can admire such a person goes to the heart of the problem in the GOP. They are not interested in actual facts or even real accomplishments. They just want their candidates to say what they want to hear.

You can add on to that quicksand metaphor by noting actions of the Congressional Republican House members and their obsession with ill defined principles and wasteful tactics to accomplish them. The idea that a government shutdown will be the trick to punish Planned Parenthood for undefined and dubious wrongs, seems to fly in the face of logic, especially when recent polling says that 69% of Americans do not want a shutdown over Planned Parenthood.

There is a "spit into the wind" mentality in these Congressional Republicans. When John Boehner resigned, he said he did it for the good of the "institution". He genuinely believed that the course they were on was not good for the country. Yet, the reaction from the conservative wing in the House was childish glee and new plots to continue the trajectory that can lead to economic chaos.

The emerging names for leadership posts are somewhat chilling. Kevin McCarthy looks like the next Speaker, but he resembles more of a weaker version of John Boehner than something truly different.

The Majority leader race seems to be centering on Tom Price, a budget hawk, Steve Scalise, who has troubling connections with racist elements in Louisiana, and newcomer Trey Gowdy, the chair of the select committee on Benghazi and Planned Parenthood super critic. There was a brief mention of Cathy McMorris Rodgers as possibly seeking the post but after a few phone calls to members she dropped out. It was hard to imagine a woman having a chance with this group...especially in this environment.

It is difficult to think of the current GOP as the future of this country. Their focus on petty political stunts....numbers that do not work...made up facts to fit their policies...all of that seems to be the workings of destruction rather than building for the next generation.

Watching the GOP these days is like watching a bad action movie....lots of explosions but no plot whatsoever.
comments (0) permalink
« First « Previous


« February 2016 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Latest posts


(one year)




RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

Powered by
Powered by SBlog
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.