Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.



 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

Midnight Musings....

Category: Society
Posted: 07/29/05 21:43, Edited: 07/29/05 21:45

by PDW58

I got permission from this blog's oversight team to start posting some rambling thougts. I get into politics pretty heavily.. I don't write opinion pieces -- this blog already has a lot of that, but I thought maybe I could add some thoughts along the way about what I observe in this political climate. Short snipets that may interest some and bore others, but good bathroom reading....

Let's take CAFTA for instance. How in the world can any self-respecting representative of MN agriculture vote for that? Change one lousy vote in the House and the thing goes down -- we got 3 schmucks representing us that have to look in the mirror and say I screwed Minnesota ....Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kline, and Mr. Ramstad. Funny how the only Republican with any balls was Gil. Go figure.

The legislative Democrats finally stood their ground on the budget, too. Its too bad it took a legislative shutdown to finish the deal but then last year they would have caved -- the climate change is moving left..

How ironic was it to see Mark Kennedy and Patty Wetterling sharing the stage on a push for Dru's Law which made it out of committee.

Anybody see that Cheri Yecke piece in the Trib about how she feels conservative women are routinely criticized for how they look by liberal pundits? What a crock... by the way, could she get a hairdo that doesn't reek of poodle skirts??? ... come to think of it, Carol Molnau looks like a 'before' picture of Linda Tripp... Michelle Bachmann gets make-up tips from Katherine Harris, and Mary Kiffmeyer uses enough hair spray to get her own personal ozone hole... Hey, this is too easy. But seriously, how stupid is it, for a conservative to fault liberals for personal insults. They invented it.

I am still trying to figure out the Bill Frist 180 on stem cells. What he is supporting still isn't enough, but it sure is a clear break from Bush. Could he be trying to prove his MD license should still be considered valid? He almost lost all medical credibility during the Schaivo scam. The Fundamentalists ain't going to like it!

The new Politics in Minnesota newsletter sure has a Republican slant to it. Of course, if Sara Janacek is the mover involved, it has to. The Democrats are represented by Blois Olson -- I'm still trying to figure out what he has on his resume to get that job. Seems to me he managed a horrible 1st District House race about 10 years ago and stumbles all over himself on Almanac once in awhile. Guess that's what passes the Janacek test...

Oh well, maybe that's enough trash for now.... back later.



comments (0) permalink

The Fundamentalist Psyche

Category: Society
Posted: 06/17/05 16:39

By Dave Mindeman

The Fundamentalist Christians were wrong. But it isn't going to matter, because they speak for God. The Terry Schaivo autopsy has offered proof that Ms. Schaivo's condition was irreversible. Her brain had atrophied to 1/2 the normal size and all those eye movements we kept seeing on videotape were meaningless because Terri was blind.

But it won't matter to the fundamentalist mentality that nearly brought government to a standstill over one "right to life" case. You see, they are never wrong. They can't be wrong, because they speak for God.

Since their belief system is that God is perfection, then it only follows that if you interpret the teachings of the faith as a spokesperson for God, then you have perfect insight. Even in this case where science has shown us the proof, they will never compromise or yield. They are defending God's Word and that can never be questioned -- even with the truth.

We have a growing number of issues that require "approval" from the Fundamentalist Right. You can't really call them the Christian Right anymore because most discerning Christians aren't willing to go as far as this politcally charged group has gone. These issues have become rallying points for these God Agents. The chasm between science and religion hasn't been this wide since Darwin's theories were questioned in the Scopes trial.

The new focus points are stem cell research, oral contraceptives, intelligent design, gay marriage, and right to die. They stake out a position that allows for no compromise....positions that put families in untenable positions. Positions that refuse to look at scientific evidence or even common sense.

These barricades, these walls cannot be torn down. They are fundamental to a belief system that refuses to look at facts, evidence, or science. It is pure and it is simple. To complicate it with nuance destroys their belief. It must be absolute or it is nothing.

If you ever wonder why there are so many denominations believing essentially the same thing, then look no furthur than fundamentalist belief for the cause. Any breach of the "faith", no matter how small, can create division so strong that one side or the other must leave. Baptismal differences, communion interpretation, and ordaining of women have all been reasons for an entire denominational split. They cannot compromise... God would never do that. Yet each side claims the moral equivalent of "the one true faith".

As this rigid belief system creeps into our political system, the danger signs are everywhere. It is the reason for partisan rancor. It is the reason for electoral apathy in new voters. It is the reason we can't find real solutions.

So why is fundamentalism thriving in American politics? Because they never deviate away from their chosen agenda. They stand for life, and how life is perceived. They stand for marriage and how they themselves have defined it. That holds them together with a black and white perceived "truth" that keeps them rigid and together.

It is when they have to discuss other areas that the divisions begin again. They aren't comfortable with rich and poor, black and white, healthy and infirmed. They instinctively know that as Christians they have deviated from their own teachings on this. But they push that aside to stand together for pre-life, end-life, and marriage-life issues. Issues they know they can stand together on, because there are no "absolutes" from the other side. Science deals in knowledge not abstract belief. And science cannot oppose an argument based on beliefs it cannot prove or disprove.

Fundamentalists live in the "gray zone". The area that science is uncomfortable with. Where arguments are endless and pointless. We all begin life at some point and we all die. Marriage is an agreement, a social contract with no intrinsic value. These are the only facts we have in these areas. Definitions are the gray zone that fuels the fundamentalist's reactionary life.

The Terry Schaivo case will never really end. It will become a symbol of how uncomfortable all of us are with life and death decisions. We can't possibly solve problems like this with legislation. There are certain things that should be left to family. Occasionally we will get wrapped up in individual stories. We should hear them but not interfere. We should seek greater understanding but make no judgments. There are some things we can't know -- the mirror that we see through darkly is not open to absolute definition. We will know the real truth when we are ready to hear it, not before.
comments (0) permalink

What Is Support?

Category: Society
Posted: 06/10/05 12:19

Some interesting letter to the editor banter appeared in the Pioneer Press lately. In a May 28th letter, a writer had questioned whether real support of our troops was shown by someone sporting a magnetic yellow ribbon displayed on a gas guzzling SUV. That prompted a response from Ken Eshom of Cottage Grove:

I disagree with David Maeda's May 28 letter on the "Support Our Troops" ribbons that adorn "gas-guzzling monstrosities." Regardless of the vehicle they drive, I applaud those who show their support for the men and women who are placing their lives in danger on a daily basis.

I drive a vehicle that is lacking in the fuel-economy department and have a ribbon proudly affixed to it, but I feel it doesn't lessen my support for a son who is now serving our nation in Iraq.

I concur that we should aggressively seek alternative fuel methods and lessen our "desperate devotion" on oil, as Maeda suggests. But regardless of our personal choices, one should never deride our citizens for showing their support of our brave Americans.

KEN ESHOM
Cottage Grove


Which in turn led to some questions by mnpACT! member Glen Marshall who responds with:

Support Our Troops

Ken Eshom's June 10 rebuttal to David Maeda's May 28 letter makes a surprising assumption: that the application of a sticker or magnet in any way indicates a support of our troops. These appliques are racked with the "impulse buy" items at many convenience stores, and it came out quite a while ago that the proceeds often do not benefit any troop-related effort.
The application of a self-aggrandizing one-liner to one's trunk does nothing to support the troops.

Whether you're a dove or a hawk, give blood if you can. Contribute to programs like the American Legion's Legacy Scholarship Fund. Find legitimate veteran support organizations and do whatever you can to help. When you find good organizations, pass the word around about them.

Then, if you want to gain the admiration of your fellow citizens, go ahead and apply your sticker. Just don't pretend that it's accomplishing anything else.

Glenn Marshall


What do you think?


comments (1) permalink

Calendar

« November 2017 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30


Latest posts


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Comments



Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.