Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.



 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

McFadden: "Specifics Are Not Important"

Category: Al Franken
Posted: 04/10/14 16:43, Edited: 04/10/14 16:44

by Dave Mindeman

The Republican establishment wants to defeat Sen. Al Franken badly. And those same establishment Republicans knew that the MN state party has been in horrible financial shape.

It has been clear that they feel the only real hope to compete for this seat in 2014 was to bring in a deep pockets financial guy to push through to the nomination.

Enter Mike McFadden....a rich guy, a willing GOP donor, but a political neophyte with a zero track record on policy. In a way, the establishment was hoping this would also be a plus, since anti-government sentiment is also very high in Republican base circles.

But, given all that, there is one slight oversight in getting what they needed.

They forgot about competence.

McFadden called a news conference today - a rare occurrence for the McFadden campaign - in order to trash the one Republican issue of 2014 - Obamacare.

Unfortunately, as often happens at a press conference, reporters started asking questions on other subjects.....

McFadden would not say whether Minnesota should have used the federal exchange rather than creating its own.

He also refused to say whether he would have voted to block debate in the U.S. Senate on pay equity for women.

McFadden also refused to give a yes or no answer on whether he supports what's called "personhood" legislation, which considers a fertilized egg to be a person from the moment of conception. Many of the other Republicans in the race say they support that.

McFadden also declined to weigh in on legislative efforts this week to increase Minnesota's minimum wage.

Some of the other Republicans in the Senate contest accuse McFadden of skirting issues. Asked about his refusal to get specific, McFadden suggested specifics are not important.


When you are at a press conference "refused to say" and "declined to answer" are not things you like to see in the report.

And when he explained his idea that "specifics are not important", he ended with this....

"What I think is really important with politicians and with leaders [is] you understand their overriding philosophies -- how do they make decisions?" said McFadden. "And so I've been very specific in this campaign as to how I make decisions."

So if I understand that correctly, we can rest assured that McFadden's overriding decision making philosophy on answering questions is to never actually give an answer.

Does the MN Republican establishment actually think that's a good thing?
comments (0) permalink

MN GOP Senate Candidates - Not Much There

Category: Al Franken
Posted: 01/24/14 04:17

by Dave Mindeman

On January 17th there was a GOP Senate candidate forum sponsored by the Rochester Tea Party and the Post Bulletin covered it.

As usual, Mike McFadden could not attend -- probably out raising money in some swanky hotel somewhere....can't be bothered with debates.

But Julianne Ortman, Jim Abeler, Chris Dahlberg, and the other 3 that are just classified as "the rest" for the most part...were there. Of course, since it was a Tea Party event, the answers to policy positions were moved to the extreme....something they should be held accountable for at some point in the process.

For instance...

...all of the candidates said they do not believe in man-made climate change, except for Abeler. He did not provide a clear answer to the question.

Really? You want Minnesota to send you to the US Senate with the idea that climate change is a hoax? Seriously? Abeler waffled on it, but really, if you have an education do you really need to waffle?

And in keeping with who they were talking to....

On the issue of immigration, all of the candidates except Ortman said they oppose amnesty for people in the country illegally. Ortman specified that she opposed the Senate immigration bill.

I guess Ortman is leaving the door open for something...who knows? But as usual they offered no solution - just more negatives. How is this Party ever going to move forward?

The candidates were asked about raising money to compete....something only Mike McFadden has managed to get some attention with....but you can tell a candidate who is having serious money problems - they bring up Social Media...

Ortman told the audience "we'll have the funds we need to effectively challenge Al Franken." She said her campaign is tapping into social media and microtargeting with a particular emphasis on 18-to-24-year-olds.

Yeah....microtargeting....that's the ticket.

At this particular moment this field of candidates is a hodgepodge of nothing notable. Maybe if you combined them together (McFadden for money, Abeler for experience, Ortman for bravado)....maybe you could have one competitive candidate.

Right now, McFadden has the best approach - be invisible.
comments (0) permalink

McFadden: To Quibble or Not to Quibble...That Is The Question

Category: Al Franken
Posted: 11/04/13 12:51

by Dave Mindeman

"Al Franken shouldn't be quibbling over context."

--Republican Senate Candidate McFadden spokesman Tom Erickson

Hmmmm what the heck does that mean?

Well, it looks like the McFadden campaign has decided to tie Al Franken to the botched rollout of the ACA and Obama's promise that you would not have to change your healthcare.

After a ton of "research work", the campaign spliced together a quote that they say says this....

McFadden's campaign dug up a clip of Franken saying something similar to Obama: In a November 2009 floor speech, just his second in the Senate, Franken said, "People who are happy with their current plans would not need to change them." On Friday, McFadden released a web ad based around the quotation, saying, "Either Al Franken misled us. Or failed us."

But they got called on that one....because the quote actually is a speech in which Al Franken is defending the public option in the ACA bill.

The actual quote....

That is what the subsidies and the exchange are all about: increasing the availability of insurance and making it affordable for families and small businesses. That is also what so much of the debate surrounding a public insurance option is about. A public option creates more choice for consumers and more competition in the marketplace. People who are happy with their current plans would not need to change them. But millions of people who did not have health care options before would finally have an affordable choice. This is what the overwhelming majority of Americans want. It is the right thing to do. I would say to anyone who is against the public option, do not choose it for yourself, but do not deny other Americans that choice.

The part that McFadden clipped is in bold.

It is a context problem....but then, we shouldn't quibble.
comments (0) permalink
« First « Previous

Calendar

« April 2014 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30


Latest posts


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Comments



Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.