Minnesota Network for Progressive Action

About Comments
The mnpACT! blog welcomes all comments from visitors, which are immediately posted, but we also filter for spammers:
  • No active URLs or web links are allowed (use www.yourweb.com).
  • No drug or pharma- ceutical names are allowed.
  • Your comment "Name" must be one word with no spaces and cannot be an email address.
You should also note that a few IP addresses and homepage URLs have been banned from posting comments because they have posted multiple spam messages.

Please be aware we monitor ALL comments and reserve the right to delete obvious spam comments.



 
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Listed on BlogShares

 
site search

Site Meter
 
  Progressive Political Blog

Progressive Politics in Minnesota, the Nation, and the World

The One Constant In Our Legislative Messes - Kurt Daudt

Category: GOP House Republicans
Posted: 06/03/17 23:29

by Dave Mindeman

My concern for transparency in Minnesota government is reaching critical mass. Minnesota, generally, has a good reputation on governance, but the last few cycles have been bloody awful.

Surplus or deficit does not matter - we go down to the final hours and watch as sleep deprived lawmakers patch together a budget without much debate, without much scrutiny, without any sort of public input. It's ugly and we have to do something about it.

There is a common denominator that seems to pervade these ugly end of session scenarios. There is a constant element of gimmick budgeting. There are dead of night last minute additions that sneak into the language. There is a pervasive desire to railroad bills through on a time table that satisfies no one. There is one person who seems to stand out as an instigator in all of it.

Kurt Daudt.

Daudt likes to call press conferences and call our Governor out..mainly because he simply disagrees with Daudt. It is as if debating a topic is an obstruction.. as if providing a blue print for agreement is arrogance...or having a different agenda is just plain rude.

Daudt persistently governs as if a governor is really not necessary. The office is a nuisance. And his ideas on policy should never be questioned.

In 2015, Daudt had an additional attack on the executive branch when he belligerently handicapped the office of State Auditor. That particular snub is still in the courts, with Rebecca Otto fighting that dark of night provision.

On May 18th, 2015, Daudt took 1 and 1/2 minutes to ramrod a 90 page bill through the House without giving Democrats a chance to even give a cursory look to what they were voting on.

In that same session, he reneged on a supposed "deal" with Bakk and railroaded the DFL majority leader on final session bills.

And 2017 was worse. As City Pages outlined the problems....

1. Pre-Emption. Daudt poisoned the state pension bill by adding a provision that had been rejected by Dayton earlier in the session. Pre-Emption would take away local autonomy from cities and counties on their own internal changes to state laws. He added it to a Democratic supported bill that would grant family leave. It ended up getting vetoed - but that was what Daudt wanted in the first place.

2. A tax cut bill carried provisions to block out any dollars being spent on light rail.

3. Protections to stop internet providers from selling your browser history were taken out.

4. A health-care funding bill halved scheduled raises for home health-care workers.

5. Other cuts were made to fund a $600+ million tax cut.

Some of those things were expected and Dayton vetoed pre-emption, but here is the most galling provision of all....

A sneaky line in a state agencies bill says the Department of Revenue wouldn't get its $153 million budget until the day after Dayton signed the tax cuts. The tax bill became a ransom note.

Shutting down the Revenue department is an attack on the executive branch. It essentially takes away Dayton's power of the veto. And Daudt inserted this provision without any agreement from any of the other parties. Even Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka did not know it made it into the final bill (Almanac).

Dayton would have to veto all of the revenue bills and start over if he didn't acquiesce to this "sneak attack".

His supporters urged the vetoes. He was clear that he was considering it. But Governor Dayton did not want to potentially shutdown the government like 2011. He didn't want to put the citizens of this state through another protracted and costly negotiation. The Legislators failed to do their job - but Dayton decided he was not going to compound the situation.

The bills are law. But he decided that he would like to discuss the policy provisions that were in these bills - against his expressed negotiated position. So he did the only thing he felt could do to attract their attention - he defunded the legislature's revenue allotment.

It did get their attention, but Daudt, true to form, didn't want to talk, he wanted more fights. He is going to sue Dayton for overstepping his Constitutional authority. Daudt would claim that Dayton defunded a co-equal branch of government.

You have to wonder why defunding the Revenue Department is not a similar attack on the executive branch. But Daudt doesn't bring that up.

The taxpayers of Minnesota will be funding this fight. Both the Governor and the legislature will be paying lawyers with general revenue. As usual, the only loser in these things is Minnesota citizens.

Like I said, the common denominator in this mess and messes of the recent past is one guy - Kurt Daudt.

And guess what? He probably wants to continue these games by running for Governor in 2018.

Boy. Can't wait to see what kind of mess he can create from there. I bet the office of Governor would suddenly become very relevant.
comments (0) permalink

About Paris

Category: Environment
Posted: 06/03/17 11:53

by Dave Mindeman

When Donald Trump opted out of the Paris Agreement, most people believe that he followed the lead of Steve Bannon. The former Breitbart exec is not so much a climate denier (although he espouses that sentiment) as he is an anti-globalist. He thinks of any international cooperation as a threat to our own national sovereignty. If you think that is delusional, you are right; but a large majority of Trump's base think in those terms.

If the climate "facts" that Trump sited are any indication, Bannon filled Trump's head (and remember it does not hold much) with debunked studies and selective information on other studies. It was a typical piece of Breitbart information.

That is no way to make a major decision.

There is a positive in what Trump did here. It united the world and a large portion of this country into a more united front on climate. The attention has brought out more informative facts. The alarm bells were raised with more people listening. Trump took us out of an agreement which was largely voluntary, but it gave us guidelines to follow. Those guidelines can still be done with or without Trump's help.

The world will be looking less to the US for leadership because of this. And as long as Trump is President that may be a good thing. In a way, the rest of the globe will have to examine their own contribution to climate change in a more realistic way - and not wait for the US to weigh in.

Don't get me wrong - Trump pulling out of Paris is a big deal. And the policies that may result could be very harmful. But their is a strong resistance. Trump can only control so much - it is up to us to make things work.

It always has been.
comments (1) permalink

Calendar

« June 2017 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30


Latest posts


Archive

(one year)

Categories


Comments



Links


RSS Feeds

RSS 0.91
RSS 2.0

 
 
 
Powered by
Powered by SBlog
 
Copyright © Minnesota Network for Progressive Action. All rights reserved. Legal. Privacy Policy. Sitemap.